<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why you Always Double Check Gluten-Free Status at Restaurants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesavvyceliac.com/2009/10/28/check-gluten-free-status-restaurant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesavvyceliac.com/2009/10/28/check-gluten-free-status-restaurant/</link>
	<description>Gluten-free lifestyle for the Savvy Celiac</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:39:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Please, Do It Right. @ My Favourite Number</title>
		<link>http://thesavvyceliac.com/2009/10/28/check-gluten-free-status-restaurant/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Please, Do It Right. @ My Favourite Number</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesavvyceliac.com/?p=2976#comment-290</guid>
		<description>[...] week, Amy Leger (from The Savvy Celiac) wrote a post imploring restaurants to not “do gluten-free” simply for the sake of it.  Going gluten-free is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, Amy Leger (from The Savvy Celiac) wrote a post imploring restaurants to not “do gluten-free” simply for the sake of it.  Going gluten-free is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flybrand</title>
		<link>http://thesavvyceliac.com/2009/10/28/check-gluten-free-status-restaurant/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>flybrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesavvyceliac.com/?p=2976#comment-278</guid>
		<description>This is a great post.  I really think that our risks in eating have two components;

1.  Ingredient risk = Do we actually know what is in the food?

2.  Contamination risk = Were there other items used in the preparation other than the ingredients?

Unfortunately, even when we break out the risks, we still have to double check the ingredient risk every time.  All that we know is that past indications of what foods were okay may be an indication of future food safety, but they certainly are no guarantee.  

Better luck next time - it is great that you shared this experience!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post.  I really think that our risks in eating have two components;</p>
<p>1.  Ingredient risk = Do we actually know what is in the food?</p>
<p>2.  Contamination risk = Were there other items used in the preparation other than the ingredients?</p>
<p>Unfortunately, even when we break out the risks, we still have to double check the ingredient risk every time.  All that we know is that past indications of what foods were okay may be an indication of future food safety, but they certainly are no guarantee.  </p>
<p>Better luck next time &#8211; it is great that you shared this experience!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

